FierceEMR FierceMobileHealthcare

About hospitalimpact.org

Join our online community!

Latest Posts



Hospital Leadership Series


Hot Topics

  • Last comments
  • Subscribe to this blog!



    Subscribe in NewsGator Online

    Bounty Hunting in Hospitals

    October 28th, 2008

    by Nick Jacobs

    RAC is the magic bullet that CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) is using to describe the new federal Medicare Recovery Audit Contractor program that was officially started last week. RAC was started by the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003 to identify and correct improper payments. Third-party auditors get to keep a piece of the payments they identify and collect as inappropriate.

    Not unlike the health care environment created during the Clinton Administration, there seems to be a natural assumption that hospitals are basically working day and night to game the system.

    [More:]

    Let’s see; first, the most complex, onerous, burdensome, tedious, time consuming billing system in the world is created by the government, then the government finds an even more complicated way to come back and evaluate our ability to maneuver appropriately through the white water park that they themselves are completely responsible for creating. The RAC auditors can demand virtually any number of patient charts, and then take the money back from months and years earlier and keep a portion of it.

    An article entitled RAC opinion-steering by Jennifer Lubell in this week’s Modern Healthcare provides us with additional insights on this subject. It is obvious that this program is intended to accomplish one very important thing for CMS and that is to save them money. The collection or recollection, or reconciliation, or bounty hunting as referred to in the article is only going to cost Medicare about 20 cents on the dollar, not a bad return.

    When the hue and cry against government control is heard every time nationalized medicine is even hinted at, it is understandable. All you have to do is spend a day with a hospital compliance officer to understand how deep federal regulations go on thousands of levels.

    The only good news for hospitals is that, if they conduct their own RAC audits and self-disclose any findings, they can be exempt from government funded RAC audits.

    Comments:

    Comment from: Jim Wilds [Visitor]
    I was wondering if this applies to this situation below:

    If an acute care hospital that is licensed for Medicare and/or Medicaid pay for potential (private pay or private insurance only) client leads who are seeking treatment for chemical dependency without putting their licenses in in harms way?

    I am looking for any laws/regs and citations regarding this issue! Thanks.

    Permalink 10/30/08 @ 01:44
    Comment from: Dennis Jones [Visitor] · http://www.cbiz.com/kaconsults
    A huge point may have been made in the post's closing statement. If a provider self-discloses, are they inoculated via a Corporate Integrity Agreement from further RAC recovery efforts (on that specific issue?) It would seem so.
    This would be a diffucult decision, but one with a huge up-side for providers with major risks (like hospitals who admit all cardiac procedures as inpatients without case management review.)
    Permalink 12/01/08 @ 16:15
    Comment from: accounting BPO services [Visitor] · http://www.saibposervices.com/
    Thanks for sharing...

    Regards,
    accounting BPO services
    Permalink 06/26/09 @ 02:03

    Leave a comment:

    Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
    Your URL will be displayed.
    Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, a, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
    URLs, email, AIM and ICQs will be converted automatically.


    authimage

    Options:
     
    (Line breaks become <br />)
    (Set cookies for name, email & url)

    Google
     

    Get Hospital Impact in your inbox!

    Enter your Email

    Preview