Post details: Cell Phones in Hospitals

Google
 

Cell Phones in Hospitals

March 31st, 2008

by Nick Jacobs
Cell phones prohibited in our hospitals.

About five years ago, on a visit to MIT, we had a casual discussion with a physician leader, and asked why we hadn't seen signs banning cell phones. His response was fast and simple, "They don't bother anything." Ever since that visit, we lifted the ban on cell phones in our hospital, and nothing has happened to anyone.

In March 2007, Mayo Clinic researchers published the results of a study in which they attempted to deliberately create interference in medical devices through the use of cell phones. They used them near 200 different medical devices in 75 patient rooms at their facility. They also tested BlackBerry models as well. The paper published in March of '07 in the "Mayo Clinic Proceedings" says there are no "clinically imprortant interferences" when cell phones were used in a "normal" way.

According to Mayo Clinic researchers, Jeffrey Tri, Rodney Severson, Linda Hyberger, the long-held notion that they are unsafe to use in health care facilities is not valid. Three hundred tests were performed over a five-month period in 2006, without incurring a single problem.

You can look this up at www.mayoclinicproceedings.com or on Snopes.com.

Makes you wonder if cell phones are safe to use on airplanes? Maybe they're banned because the phone companies can't track you down to bill you? Any studies out there on that one?

Comments:

Comment from: Katheryne [Visitor] · http://www.rareglobe.com
Well, hospitals and airplanes is a little different. I think you would not like your plane to lost radio-traction because of your phone and hit some building on taking off. Also depending on network your phone could handle distance about 5-10km to base station. Big planes are flying a bit higher...
Permalink 03/31/08 @ 06:50
Comment from: Arthur Yip [Visitor] · http://blog.tsimzung.com
There are different conclusions about cause-effect relationship between mobile phones and medical instrument. In our clinic, I can't see any case that a wireless digital instrument could influence on medical device. Yes, we didn't test cell phones but we have no relative reports.
Permalink 03/31/08 @ 11:13
Comment from: Ed [Visitor]
Thx for the post. I am glad that the technology issue re radio interference has been put to bed. But how about cell phones with cameras? The privacy issue still exists.

Technology evolution always makes ones day interesting!
Permalink 03/31/08 @ 11:46
Comment from: Jeff [Visitor]
Handhold Cell phone output is very low less than a watt. The old transportable models which are no longer sold put out 3 watts of transmitting power. If interference was a problem at this low wattage you would not want to use that equipment anyway.

as for airplane, if a cell phone will bring down a plane I would not want to fly on that plane. Same goes with hospital equipment.
Permalink 03/31/08 @ 14:36
Comment from: Scott [Visitor]
The real issue around cell phones is the camera. I would love to see how HIPPA privacy policy can be maintained when half the folks in an oncology or positive care clinic can use phones to photograph the waiting room.
Permalink 03/31/08 @ 15:23
Comment from: Lavinia Weissman [Visitor] · http://www.laviniaweissman.com
The real issue about cell phones is EMF.

Go to my website at

www.laviniaweissman.com/publications.php

and read my article on Cell Phone Health Hazards: Threat or Opportunity.

The interesting part is that EMF contributes to the vicious cycle of disease and its contributing factors to childhood leukemia, autism, brain tumors, FMS, MS and Parkinsons.

Yet radiation is an fact of life as part of how we test and help people with those diseases.

last year I had a wonderful conversation with a doctor in pediatric oncology in Santa Barbara when a EMF remediation expert misunderstood him at a talk when he said radiation is too dangerous for children with cancer. What he said was this was a conversation of difficulty when the exposure that may have caused the problem may also be part of the solution and for many families a threshold to last hope.

We have so much to learn about the impact of technology on the environment and disease. Hospitals could have a full agenda, if the conversations were not so difficult and exercising precaution was not something that invited so much skepticsim and cynicism.
Permalink 04/02/08 @ 17:37
Comment from: Drug Rehab [Visitor] · http://www.wedorecover.com
Cell phones can be very intrusive when in a shared space.
Permalink 04/04/08 @ 05:58

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.
Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, a, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
URLs, email, AIM and ICQs will be converted automatically.

authimage

Options:
 
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email & url)

Google