About hospitalimpact.org

Join our online community!

Latest Posts



Hospital Leadership Series


Hot Topics

  • Last comments
  • Subscribe to this blog!



    Subscribe in NewsGator Online

    Hospital Impact can also be seen through:

    Bending the Curve – Promoting Health & Disease Prevention

    February 6th, 2008

    by Christopher Cornue

    A continuing look at the Commonwealth Fund’s recent report, Bending the Curve: Options for Achieving Savings and Improving Value in US Healthcare Spending finds us reviewing their second area of focus – that of Promoting Health & Disease Prevention. By lowering the incidence of disease through increased public health initiatives and improved care, significant cost savings can be realized in our health care system. Chronic disease is their primary focus, making the assertion that prevention of continued dependence upon healthcare will curb costs significantly. Research conducted by the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention suggest that medical costs for individuals with chronic disease represents 75% of total health care expenditures. Their three primary areas of health promotion & disease prevention are:

    • Reducing Tobacco Use
    • Reducing Obesity
    • Positive Incentives for Health

    Reducing Tobacco Use – tobacco usage, including cigarette smoking, is arguably the single most avoidable cause of death in the US. Lung cancer, respiratory disease, heart disease and stroke have all been associated with tobacco usage. During the late 1990s, the CDC estimated that cigarette smoking led to $75 billion in health care expenditures and close to $100 billion in lost productivity. The Bending the Curve Report recommended the increase of the excise tax on cigarettes from $0.39 to $2.39. The additional revenue would be funneled to: 1) CDC’s national tobacco control programs; 2) development of grants to states for their own programs, providing they adhered to minimum tobacco control standards such as banning smoking in workplaces and enclosed locations.

    Reducing Obesity – obesity has become an increasing problem in the US over the past several years, with the share of national health expenditures related to obesity falling in the 5-9% range. This presents a significant opportunity in reducing costs and combating this issue. The report recommends establishing a new tax on sugar-sweetened beverages at a rate of $0.01 per 12 ounce serving. These revenues would be used to create grants for states to develop individualized obesity prevention programs, providing they met specific minimum obesity control requirements. Additional suggestions offered in this report: 1) requiring restaurants to display nutritional information; 2) requiring schools to ban sugar-sweetened soft drinks; and 3) enforcing requirements for healthy meals in schools.

    Positive Incentives for Health – it has been suggested that our own personal behavior (i.e., smoking, diet, physical activity, etc.) has a significant impact on our health and mortality. Therefore, if we take ownership and change these behaviors, our health can be improved and the costs related to treating disease can be reduced. Disease management and wellness programs which encourage individuals to embrace healthy behaviors are becoming increasingly present in our society. Federal grants to states to develop and promote these programs and encourage insurance companies to incentivize individuals to participate are examples of policies in Bending the Curve. Additionally, broadening the rules for Flexible Spending Accounts to allow for participation in programs to quit smoking or control weight would encourage participation.

    On a side note, it’s important to state that these activities don’t need to wait for approval at the Federal or State levels. Action can be taken community by community. An example of this is a developing initiative in Chicago. I had the fortunate opportunity to attend a kick-off meeting this week, hosted by the American Medical Association and the Chicago Department of Public Health – “Building a Healthier Chicago.” Though in very early states, experts and concerned groups assembled for a day-long discussion about necessary efforts to create a healthier Chicago. Many of the initiatives and policies brought forth by the Bending the Curve report were discussed as plausible initiatives that a community can tackle. More information about this will be provided as it develops. Stay tuned …

    Comments:

    Comment from: hospitaltony [Member]
    (a comment from Mike Pringle)

    “I wonder what the folks at Commonwealth Fund would say to the folks at the Public Library of Science Medicine journal in London who have just contradicted them. The study which I posted on my site shows that it actually costs more to care for healthy people than it does for smokers or obese folks, and that healthy people seem to have a higher rate of strokes. Granted the study did show a longevity difference in the number of years one is expected to live but. This type of news becomes very confusing for the public and makes it much more difficult for healthcare providers to make an argument for “healthy living”. From where I am sitting I have to wonder about the research methods, data collection, statistical manipulation etc. with the two studies. Is there a conflict relative to geographics with the data and conclusions or is it research design, or simply something else?
    Permalink 02/06/08 @ 13:11
    Comment from: Jen McCabe Gorman [Visitor] · http://www.healthmgmtrx.blogspot.com
    Re: Positive Incentives.

    1. Put recess back in public schools. Take field trips. Physical Education, or PE, as well as arts education (music, etc). is NOT an expendable part of a municipal budget. Let's get our kids active.

    2. Cities - encourage a low carbon footprint commute. Provide incentives for commuters who walk and bike (and skateboard, wheelchair, inline skate, scooter, etc. to work (not drive, not metro, not train, etc). Tax breaks may work, but a rebate check in the mail will work faster. Consider a trade in your cars reward program based on the trade in your firearms for cash (and amnesty) campaign in DC. Would anyone turn in their car? I would...

    And finally, design pedestrian friendly areas. We have huge brown spaces and industrial areas that could be foot-traffic friendly. Which city will be the first to have EVERY building LEED certified by the US Green Building Council?
    Permalink 02/10/08 @ 12:16
    Comment from: buyvasacor [Visitor] · http://www.buyvasacor.com
    Nice Post
    Permalink 03/20/08 @ 05:20
    Comment from: Deepu Singla [Visitor] · http://www.goagifts.com
    Contents of this website are good and appreciative. Recommended to all. http://www.goagifts.com, http://www.calcuttaonnet.com

    Permalink 03/24/08 @ 07:07
    Comment from: Amyobus Key [Visitor] · http://www.cathetel.com/quit_smoking.htm
    Increasing taxes on cigarettes makes the habit much more difficult to stop, as it increases its apparent value and its association with rebelliousness. We take the opposite view: remove all taxes on cigarettes, but increase the opportunity to educate the smoker, and provide assistance to him in quitting. Most smokers actually want to quit but they are as hooked on the artificially inflated value given to cigarettes by their high cost, as they are hooked on the nicotine. If governments really wanted to help smokers, they would HELP THEM and not gouge them financially, thereby increasing their misery and their need to smoke to seek relief.
    Permalink 05/08/08 @ 23:27
    Comment from: Dr. Saba [Visitor] · http://onlineconsultation.com/

    How about increasing access to healthcare for the millions who don't have access - that would promote health and disease prevention.

    In the next ten years, advancements in telemedicine will promote health and disease prevention particularly for the chronically ill.

    Anyone with a computer will be able to receive virtual consultation/treatments with their doctor online.
    Permalink 07/01/08 @ 16:15
    Comment from: pagerank sorgulama [Visitor] · http://www.pagerank-toplist.com
    thanks. super site
    Permalink 07/20/08 @ 05:05
    Tobacco is indeed one of the main problems. How you smoke and how much you smoke are both important. Cigar smokers may spend up to an hour smoking a single large cigar that can contain as much tobacco as a pack of cigarettes. Smoking more cigars each day or inhaling cigar smoke leads to more exposure and higher risks.
    Permalink 07/27/08 @ 09:11

    Leave a comment:

    Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
    Your URL will be displayed.
    Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, a, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
    URLs, email, AIM and ICQs will be converted automatically.


    authimage

    Options:
     
    (Line breaks become <br />)
    (Set cookies for name, email & url)

    Google
     

    Get Hospital Impact in your inbox!

    Enter your Email

    Preview