by Nick Jacobs

The World Congress on Cardiology is meeting this week in Belgrade, Serbia, and, as an invited speaker, we are going to be exploring the efficacy of the coronary artery disease reversal program currently being studied at our research institute. One of the most unique findings of our studies, as identified by our lead researcher on this topic, Dr. Darrell Ellsworth, is a major reduction in measurable depression scores. After having personally gone through the program nearly ten years ago, it is very clear to me exactly why this is the case.

When any type of serious medical reality hits us, be it a cancer, heart disease, or neurological dysfunction, we are thrown into a spiral that feels irreversible. All of our lives, we have worked very hard to ensure that we had as much control over our personal situation as possible. At the same time, we tend to live in denial of our own mortality until we are staring it directly in the face.

What we/I have found with programs like the Dean Ornish Coronary Artery Disease is that, not unlike the old factory experiment directed toward seeing if low lighting or bright lighting made the employees happier, the outcome was that either worked equally well because the act of changing the lighting demonstrated that someone was paying attention to them.

In our research, a group of highly trained medical professionals work carefully with each participant to explain his or her condition, risks, challenges and alternatives. The most important outcome, however, is that the patients are taught how NOT to be victims of their disease anymore.

It is my deep belief that every human being would benefit from this type of exposure to medical professionals, people who take the time to help us sort through our personal situations, to give us hope and to ensure that we will have mental and physical support while working toward improving our health both mentally and physically.

by Jeff McKune

Tony posted an entry about HealthVault, and it looks like Microsoft has multiple healthcare irons in the fire. HealthVault appears to be more of a consumer oriented PHR platform, while Azyxxi is a data warehousing and query tool that is directed at healthcare organizations such as hospitals. It should not be any surprise that the healthcare industry has caught the eye of one of the world's largest information technology companies. We hope to see a demonstration of Azyxxi soon, and one of us will provide an update with additional details at that time.

To add to the discussion regarding using generalized networking tools such as Facebook in a healthcare context, we should mention the Joint Commission's most recent efforts. The Joint Commission has started a wiki called WikiHealthCare based on the TWiki enterprise collaboration and knowledge management solution. A wiki is a tool that allows knowledge to be shared and edited by multiple contributors. Wikipedia is good example of a very popular wiki.

It looks like smoking cessation was the sprout from which WikiHealthCare grew, and it now includes the following general discussion categories:

Quality Improvement Discussion & Solutions
Smoking Cessation Counseling Programs
Smoke Free Hospital Campus

Standards Development & Research
The Transfer of Health Information
Pharmacist Review and Use of Protocols for Contrast Agents in Radiology
Microsystems and Patient-Centered Care

WikiHealthCare was announced on September 12 and in less than a month, there are 2,774 registered users of the system.

It would seem that the vision of online collaboration using multiple information technology tools and covering a wide variety of consumer and management healthcare topics is unfolding as we discuss this. So what will the future bring as these systems develop? The key concepts of integration, consumerism, transparency, and quality will no doubt shape these systems. Will there continue to be separate and distinct physician, hospital management, and patient wikis, blogs, and networking tools? These are growing now, but I believe that we are not very far from a time when patients, physicians, and hospital administrators will be sharing information, expectations, challenges, and collaborative solutions using these online tools. You may be seeing some of this already at your hospital.

The technical walls for sharing information are, for all practical purposes, non-existent. The expansive school of hard knocks, coupled with business models that demand trust (HealthVault won't stand a chance if there is a breach), are forcing companies to more stringently address online security issues. It's not technical and security bricks in these walls - it is more likely legal and cultural issues that hinder open communications.

The pieces are falling into place. How will this change health care when we all sit down at the virtual table and talk on a global scale? It sounds sci-fi, but it isn't. It's happening.

by Nick Jacobs

It dawned on me the other day that several of my recent posts have been about problems, but many of them do not prescribe solutions. This one has a solution. If your doctor doesn't give you alternatives, fire him. If he or she doesn't encourage you to get a second or even third opinion, get another physician. If, as a man over 40, you have not had your prostate checked, question your physician's ability to practice. If you're a female over 40 and you are not receiving advice relative to your breast or pap exams, your physician is not doing his or her job.

Where is this coming from? Over the past twenty plus years, it has been my very bad experience to have known a number of physicians who are completely driven by finance. The goal of these physician is to do the fastest, least thorough medicine possible, just above the lawsuit level. It is their challenge each day to get as may patients through their practice as humanly possible, and skip the details. We've all known people like this, but in medicine they can be lethal.

When questioned about the percentage of patients recommended to have mammography each year from one of these practices, the reply is short and sweet. "Don't know, don't care. Takes time to write prescriptions and make arrangements. Probably less than 10% of those who need it."

When asked how much can be made by selling drugs to patients from an in-house pharmacy, though, you will receive a price quote per pill, per ounce, per patient or per hour. If there is a piece of equipment for which this physician can receive a professional fee on the property, every patient possible will be run through it as often as insurance will allow. Chest x-ray? Stress tests? Halter monitors? If it's part of the financial base, it will be part of your bill. In chiropractic they call these practitioners churners.

Somewhere along the way docs like this get off the Hippocratic path. They stop remembering what medicine is about, and many times stop caring about those people who have placed their lives in their hands. Nothing infuriates me more than a physician in a meeting who ignores three pages and three cell phone calls. It makes me ask the question, “What if that page was about someone that I loved?” These physicians usually avoid admitting patients to a hospital for even severe situations, and they are most often extremely rich.

Watch out for the signs of greed displayed by your personal physician because they are not always materially visible. Sometimes it's ownership of a lot of land, a place in Aspen, the newest Porsche, more diamond rings on their fingers than could be mined in a week; but, most often, it's a detached, cold, fast paced, business-like approach to you that makes you feel more like a widget than a person.

If you experience this, say, “Thank you doc. Please give me a copy of my medical record,” and then run like hell.