Post details: So which pillar was that?

Google
 

So which pillar was that?

August 10th, 2007

by Jeff McKune

It is interesting to visit with those at other hospitals and see commonalities between institutions. One of the first of these commonalities that I noticed was the five pillars. Sometimes the pillars are expressed as part of an organization's values, and other times they serve as a means of categorizing strategic plans. Perhaps your hospital has these same pillars, or something similar: People, Service, Growth, Finance, and Quality. Each time I have heard of these pillars, the "People" pillar is listed first, and often someone will say something like "Our People pillar is first, because we put our people first."

A quick glance at an income statement will certainly confirm that people costs - salaries and benefits - typically comprise 55 to 60 percent of a hospital's operational expenses. But do those expenses really count as investments in those all important human resources that make healthcare work? Fundamentally, healthcare, at least in the context of a hospital, is delivered by people. I won't downplay the importance of facility expansions and technology purchases that keep a hospital in the forefront of quality care. But let's remember that it is not the facilities or the technology that are actually delivering the care - it is our people.

We can look back at our institutions and remember a timeline of growth. It often goes something like this: "We added our East Addition in 1990 at a cost of $20M, increasing our capacity by 50 beds. In 2000 we added two 16-slice CT systems to our imaging department at a cost of $3M. Our new Cardiology Department has allowed us to provide new services to our community at a cost of $25M."

These are all good things, but when was the last time you heard a healthcare leader say "In 2002 we recognized a need to improve staff retention and maximize the productivity of our human resources, and we invested $3M in our new leadership development program. Seeing significant improvements in several areas, including employee satisfaction and patient satisfaction, we continued our investment in our people in 2005 by establishing an in-house university, improved tuition reimbursement for academic education and professional certifications, and mandatory annual HR training for all leaders at the director level and up - all at an initial cost of $7M with annual operational expenses of $2.5M. In addition, all of our senior staff are actively involved in our leadership development efforts, participating both as students and instructors on a regular basis."

There are ample research studies to demonstrate the benefits of this kind of HR focus in an organization. Would it make a difference in our hospitals if we really took that first pillar seriously?

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: Lavinia Weissman [Visitor] · http://www.workecology.com
Jeff, again---welcome to Hospital Impact.
I find your posting here very refreshing.

People first is a very different way to think and act. When you say People first it can mean your employees, your patients, your suppliers, your 3rd party relationships.

In my experience that implies something that health care and other industries could really benefit from in investigation, the value of dialogue and learning.

I have told Tony this and now I will repeat it here. Often when I read entries about hospitals and institutions and what they are doing to make changes, I feel like the hospital is silo and the people (if people first) are not really organized for a conversation of innovation whereby people really learn and investigate together.

How would hospitals benefit from "the first pillar?" and would it be okay if the first pillar was adopted and established as a mechanism for learning and we did not know what that means and commit the intention to foster something new that will make a difference.
Permalink 08/11/07 @ 15:29
Comment from: Pete McGinn [Visitor] · http://www.leadershipimpact.com
Jeff, I once wrote a short piece in which I said we should treat our people as well as we treat our machines. Many organizations put more thought into the acquisition of capital equipment than into a new hire. They develop preventative maintenance plans. If there is a problem, they don't throw the machine out, they figure out how to fix it.
Over the years, however, I have seen significant improvement in this respect. Hospitals are becoming more enlightened along the lines you suggested above. I was formerly CEO of a health system, and we spent a lot of time, attention, and resources to improve the quality of work life. Our employee satisfaction scores were in the top 10% nationally, and quality, patient satisfaction, and financial results all followed in turn. I have seen others doing likewise. There are good reasons to be optimistic.
Permalink 08/12/07 @ 09:47
Comment from: Carolyn Kent [Visitor] · http://www.hospitaldx.com
Hi Jeff - great post!

I've been spending a lot of time lately deepening my understanding of Porter's five forces and how they translate to development of a rock-solid strategy for establishing a competitive advantage.

I am coming across more and more literature that supports the notion of leveraging your internal resources to build an inimitable fit of activities as part of an organization's strategic direction. It's evident (and your post certainly supports this) that an organization's People are the cornerstone for maintaining a clear strategic direction and competitive advantage. Thanks for sharing!
Permalink 08/13/07 @ 15:34

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.
Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, a, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
URLs, email, AIM and ICQs will be converted automatically.

authimage

Options:
 
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email & url)

Google